GAME THEORY APPLIED TO CUSTODY CONFLICTS
Palavras-chave:
Game Theory, Brazilian Family Law., Child Custody., Joint Custody, Zero-sum game, Non-zero-sum game
Resumo
This paper deals with the use of game theory in Family Law, especially in custody cases. It presents Game Theory and two of its modalities – zero-sum game and nonzero-sum game – and its uses in disputes concerning which parent shall be awarded custody. The intent is to draw a parallel between the attitude of parents disputing their child’s custody and game theory, as well as to present how to address these matters in order to achieve the intended outcome in accordance with the rule applicable in Brazilian Law, which is joint custody
Referências
BAIRD, Douglas G.; GERTNER, Robert H.; PICKER, Randal C. Game Theory and the Law. 6 ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.
BRASIL. Congress. Senate. Civil Code. Law 10406, of January 10, 2002, Brasília, DOU 11 jan. 2002. p. 01.
______. Congress. Senate. Child and Teenager Act. Law 8069, of july 13, 1990, Brasília, DOU 16 jul. 1990. p. 13.563.
______. Congress. Senate. Parental Alienation Act. Law 12318, of august 26, 2010, Brasília, DOU 27 aug. 2010, p. 3.
______. National Council of Justice. National Judicial Policy for adequate treatment of conflicts of interest within the scope of the Judiciary. Resolution 125 of november 29, 2010. DOU 1º dec. 2010, p. 1.
CANCIAN, Maria; MEYER, Daniel R. Who gets custody? In: Demography, 1998, Volume 35, p. 147. Avaliabe at: <https://doi.org/10.2307/3004048>. Accessed on: Oct.30.2017.
CEZAR-FERREIRA, Verônica Apparecida da Motta. Guarda compartilhada: Uma visão psicojurídica do relacionamento parental pós-separação ou divórcio. Doctoral Thesis in Clinical Psychology. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo: 2013.
COOTER, Robert; MARKS, Stephen; MNOOKIN, Robert. Bargaining in the Shadow of The Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior. Journal of Legal Studies, vol. XI. Chicago: The University of Chicago, June 1982.
DAVIS, Morton D. Game Theory: a nontechnical introduction. New York: Dover Publications, 1997.
DIAS, Maria Berenice. Manual de Direito das Famílias. 12 ed. São Paulo: RT, 2017. Ebook ISBN 978-85-203.7181-7. Avaliabe at: <https://proview.thomsonreuters.com/>. Accessed on: Nov.06.2017.
MNOOKIN, Robert H.; KORNHAUSER, Lewis. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce. In: The Yale Law Journal, vol. 88, nº. 5, 1979, pp. 950–997. JSTOR, Avaliabe at: <www.jstor.org/stable/795824>. Accessed on: Oct.30.2017.
PUGLIESI, Márcio. Teoria do Direito. 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009.
NASH JR, John F. Equilibrium points in n-person games. New Jersey: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America - PNAS, vol. 36 n. 1, Princeton University Press, 1949.
NEUMANN, John von; MORGENSTERN, Oskar. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 6. ed. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2007.
ROBLES, Gregorio. As regras do direito e as regras dos jogos – Ensaio sobre a Teoria Analítica do Direito. Trad. Pollyana Mayer. São Paulo: Noeses, 2011.
ZELEZNIKOW, Jonh; BELLUCCI, Emilia. Family_Winner: Integrating Game Theory and Heuristics to Provide Negotiation Support. Australia: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2003, The sixteenth Annual Conference.
BRASIL. Congress. Senate. Civil Code. Law 10406, of January 10, 2002, Brasília, DOU 11 jan. 2002. p. 01.
______. Congress. Senate. Child and Teenager Act. Law 8069, of july 13, 1990, Brasília, DOU 16 jul. 1990. p. 13.563.
______. Congress. Senate. Parental Alienation Act. Law 12318, of august 26, 2010, Brasília, DOU 27 aug. 2010, p. 3.
______. National Council of Justice. National Judicial Policy for adequate treatment of conflicts of interest within the scope of the Judiciary. Resolution 125 of november 29, 2010. DOU 1º dec. 2010, p. 1.
CANCIAN, Maria; MEYER, Daniel R. Who gets custody? In: Demography, 1998, Volume 35, p. 147. Avaliabe at: <https://doi.org/10.2307/3004048>. Accessed on: Oct.30.2017.
CEZAR-FERREIRA, Verônica Apparecida da Motta. Guarda compartilhada: Uma visão psicojurídica do relacionamento parental pós-separação ou divórcio. Doctoral Thesis in Clinical Psychology. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo: 2013.
COOTER, Robert; MARKS, Stephen; MNOOKIN, Robert. Bargaining in the Shadow of The Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior. Journal of Legal Studies, vol. XI. Chicago: The University of Chicago, June 1982.
DAVIS, Morton D. Game Theory: a nontechnical introduction. New York: Dover Publications, 1997.
DIAS, Maria Berenice. Manual de Direito das Famílias. 12 ed. São Paulo: RT, 2017. Ebook ISBN 978-85-203.7181-7. Avaliabe at: <https://proview.thomsonreuters.com/>. Accessed on: Nov.06.2017.
MNOOKIN, Robert H.; KORNHAUSER, Lewis. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce. In: The Yale Law Journal, vol. 88, nº. 5, 1979, pp. 950–997. JSTOR, Avaliabe at: <www.jstor.org/stable/795824>. Accessed on: Oct.30.2017.
PUGLIESI, Márcio. Teoria do Direito. 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009.
NASH JR, John F. Equilibrium points in n-person games. New Jersey: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America - PNAS, vol. 36 n. 1, Princeton University Press, 1949.
NEUMANN, John von; MORGENSTERN, Oskar. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 6. ed. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2007.
ROBLES, Gregorio. As regras do direito e as regras dos jogos – Ensaio sobre a Teoria Analítica do Direito. Trad. Pollyana Mayer. São Paulo: Noeses, 2011.
ZELEZNIKOW, Jonh; BELLUCCI, Emilia. Family_Winner: Integrating Game Theory and Heuristics to Provide Negotiation Support. Australia: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2003, The sixteenth Annual Conference.
Publicado
12-09-2018
Seção
Artigos
